@steven chen 虽然需要更多具体的证据赢得case against Harvard, 但是有的legal scholars 甚至普通人也可以发现的事实是 Harvard 等的确在勇隐形的歧视政策。quote如下：Even though the percentage of Asians in the population has been growing, the percentage admitted to Harvard has remained almost unchanged for many years. That strongly suggests a quota policy, which hardly seems to comport with the law.
It’s very revealing that at another of America’s elite universities, Cal Tech, the percentage of Asian students has risen steadily, from 26 percent in 1993 to 42.5 percent today. Cal Tech is notable for not playing the “diversity” game with admissions and admitting students just based on their evident academic strength, not on their race or ethnicity.
Harvard discriminates against Asians as it once did to Jews By Betsy McCaughey May 19, 2015 | 6:22pm
Harvard discriminates against Asians as it once did to Jews
If you’re applying to Harvard and your last name is Wong or Liu, changing it to Lopez or Luciano might just make the difference you need to get in. Harvard routinely rejects “Asian” applicants in favor of whites and sought-after minorities with lower test scores and grades. Enrollment data reveal that Harvard limits Asian-Americans to a flat 15-18 percent of the student body, year after year, though they increasingly dominate the top of the applicant pool. To smoke out ethnicity, Harvard requires applicants to provide their parents’ place of birth, mother’s maiden name and whether their family has ever changed its name. These questions, along with an interview requirement, were devised in the 1920s to limit the number of Jewish students. Now Asians are the new Jews, welcome only in limited numbers. Last Friday, 64 Asian-American organizations filed a complaint with the Department of Education challenging Harvard’s quota system. Harvard denies it has one, but the evidence that it does is convincing — and sickening. The complaint states that Harvard is violating Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 by discriminating on the basis of race. Harvard general counsel Robert W. Iuliano responds that the college’s admissions process is “highly individualized” and “holistic.” But admissions data say otherwise. Amazingly, no matter how the racial makeup of the applicant pool changes year to year, the outcome is the same cookie-cutter student body: 15-18 percent Asian, 42-49 percent white, 6-8 percent African-American and 7-9 percent Hispanic, plus others. It’s not believable that this could be happening absent racial quotas, when Asian high-school students make up twice the share of total college applicants that they did two decades ago, and they are sweeping up academic prizes everywhere. In New York, Asians make up 7 percent of the population but garner nearly one-third of the National Merit Scholarship finalists. Asians represent 11 percent of California high-school students but 60 percent of that state’s National Merit Scholars. California bans taking race into consideration in its university admissions. No surprise that Asians are now 42 percent of the students at Cal Tech, up from 25 percent two decades ago. If race were not being used to limit Asian acceptances, the same thing would be happening at Harvard. The Harvard Crimson reports that Asians have to score hundreds of points higher on their SATs to get accepted. They’re not competing against all applicants, just other Asians. The Ivy League’s Asian quotas are an open secret. Princeton Review, a guide for students applying to college, warns Asian-Americans not to attach a picture or write their essay on the importance of family: “If you are an Asian-American — or even if you simply have an Asian or Asian-sounding surname — you need to be careful about what you do and don’t say.” Harvard says it treats each applicant as an individual, but pigeonholing someone as “Asian” is hardly individualistic. Asian includes those from India, Korea, China, Vietnam, Japan or many other cultures, and religions ranging from Buddhist to Hindu to Christian to Muslim. The complaint concedes that racial diversity is an important goal in assembling a college class, but it cites plenty of evidence that giving poor kids a leg up in the admissions process is just as effective as racial quotas in making sure African-Americans and Hispanics get in: “We are willing to support such Affirmative Action.” Fair enough. And it will also benefit students like Kai Chan, who is named in the complaint and is now earning a doctorate at Princeton. “I am the son of poor, non-English-speaking parents, neither of whom attended high school. They never read to me as a child . . . I attended five high schools, one of which was known locally as ‘last chance high,’ ” says Chan. Despite working nearly full-time through high school and college, Chan is making his mark as a scholar. Too bad Harvard’s admissions system was rigged against him, simply because his name is Chan.
