logo
PAChat 交火M1-华人问政 ( 1381 Members )
  • All Members
    1381
  • Group Name
    交火M1-华人问政
  • Group Description
    None
  • Group Rules
    ...
  • 谈云识天气
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @菁菁 that was the very base of U Texas and Harvard's current admission policy.
  • 菁菁
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @谈云识天气 What is?
  • 谈云识天气
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • There is no law saying universities has to treat different race different. It is all universities' own choice. Any discrimination is de facto, not de jure.
  • zhongdan lan
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @小鱼  声明中立就象说“我不是民主党”。
  • 菁菁
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @谈云识天气 这是连基本是非不分了吧,哈哈
  • 小鱼
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @zhongdan lan 关键是.....大伙儿都有头脑不是?
  • 谈云识天气
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @菁菁 you need study more.
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @菁菁 @谈云识天气 racial discrimination is NOT prohibited in college admissions. There is no Supreme Court case saying it is prohibited
  • 菁菁
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @谈云识天气 就像1+1=3,一看就是错了
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @菁菁 don't believe what 谈云said
  • 菁菁
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • 而且关键是没有common sense,看一眼不知道错的都是没有common sense
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • All his knowledge is newly googled, fragmented and inaccurate
  • 菁菁
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • 法律虽然很难懂,但是不会,
  • zhongdan lan
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @菁菁 有的同学“选择性无知”
  • 菁菁
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • 好吧,大家继续聊,我有事
  • 谈云识天气
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • It's not that hard, as long as you can handle reading comprehension.
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @谈云识天气 please show me where you read racial discrimination is prohibited in college admissions.
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • Don't mislead people using your newly googled knowledge
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • Title VI of Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibits racial discrimination in programs receiving federal funds. But Bakke v. University of California in 1978 opened an exception
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • MR. JUSTICE POWELL concluded:

      1. Title VI proscribes only those racial classifications that would violate the Equal Protection Clause if employed by a State or its agencies. Pp. 438 U. S. 281-287.
  • Henry Yang撤回了一条消息
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • But certain racial discrimination in college admissions is permitted by Bakke decision, so it is exempt from Title VI
  • liang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @刘运畴\纽约\理财 热烈欢迎入群并积极发言! 能否请您自我介绍一下?
  • 谈云识天气
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @Henry Yang I'm boarding a plane. And you are making the points for me. Thank you!
  •  张萍
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • 刚刚看到这个,不知道以前群里是否发过?
  •  张萍
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看
    • 为什么美国名校要限制亚裔学生名额?
      同样的平时成绩和考试分数,黑人能横扫藤校,而亚裔连藤校的门都摸不到。统计显示,哈佛亚裔学生SAT(美国高考)成绩比白人学生平均高140分。无论是客观数据,还是华人社区的主观感受,美国名校对亚裔学生的名额限制是实际存在的。那究竟是什么原因导致了这样的歧视呢?
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @谈云识天气 No. You said "There is no question "racial discrimination" is illegal. ". But this is a WRONG statement
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • Racial discrimination is indeed legal in college admissions.
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • This is exactly what we are fighting against
  • 谈云识天气
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • Through the courts? Judicial activism?
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @谈云识天气 court interprets the law
  • steven chen
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @Henry Yang You try to fight against the law of this land? It can be done, but good luck.
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @steven chen did you understand justice Powell's opinion?
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • MR. JUSTICE POWELL concluded:

      1. Title VI proscribes only those racial classifications that would violate the Equal Protection Clause if employed by a State or its agencies. Pp. 438 U. S. 281-287.
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, MR. JUSTICE WHITE, MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL, and MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN concluded:

      1. Title VI proscribes only those racial classifications that would violate the Equal Protection Clause if employed by a State or its agencies. Pp. 438 U. S. 328-355.
  • 刘运畴\纽约\理财
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @liang 谢谢 刘运畴 男 在纽约从事理财。本人积极参与争取华人权益的社会活动。特别是在“鸡毛事件”中更是全程参与。我个人也是旅美湖南同乡会的负责人之一,也积极帮助乡亲融入美国社会。
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • So it was a majority opinion
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • We are fighting in the court. Supreme Court can overturn Bakke
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • And ban racial discrimination in college admissions once and for all
  • liang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @刘运畴\纽约\理财 谢谢 众人拾柴火焰高,我们一起来努力!
  • 谈云识天气
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @Henry Yang According to you, "Racial discrimination is indeed legal in college admissions." You overstated it, didn't you?!
  • steven chen
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • D 已经被禁止了。你要全面禁止RD 很难。@Henry Yang 
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @谈云识天气 No. Please read Bakke opinion carefully, and in whole
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • MR. JUSTICE POWELL concluded:

      1. Title VI proscribes only those racial classifications that would violate the Equal Protection Clause if employed by a State or its agencies. Pp. 438 U. S. 281-287.
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • MR. JUSTICE BRENNAN, MR. JUSTICE WHITE, MR. JUSTICE MARSHALL, and MR. JUSTICE BLACKMUN concluded:

      1. Title VI proscribes only those racial classifications that would violate the Equal Protection Clause if employed by a State or its agencies. Pp. 438 U. S. 328-355.
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • Bakke limited Title VI's scope
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看
    • The Supreme Court may be on the verge of ending affirmative action | MSNBC
      http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/the-supreme-court-may-be-the-verge-ending-affirmative-action
  • Henry Yang
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @steven chen please read the title of above article loudly
  • steven chen
    • 此条消息已被屏蔽, 点击查看

    • @Henry Yang 早就看过了。我们看结果。
  • liang邀请Shaoyi He/何绍义加入了群聊
 Share with WeChat
Open your WeChat,Scan QR Code,and then click the share button in the top right corner of your screen.