@zhongdan lan 这里谁是候选人？

候選人自己知道，也有些群友知道。我知道哪些是候選人，但是不宜公開。

"BREMMER: A senior administration official told me, 'If I did what Hillary did, I think I'd be in jail"

@谈云识天气 美国法院不是立法机构，它只会裁决大学招生种族歧视合不合法，或者多少歧视才合法，不会提供solution

Solution是各州立法机构或者大学自己的事

废除种族歧视后各州或者大学会如何应对？没有人能完全预测。但是加州可以提供一个范例。Berkeley 和UCLA里的亚裔都超过了40%

你的这种胆怯心态，就像废除黑奴前黑人战战兢兢地问，废除奴隶制后，黑人们自己能不能站立？他们的前途是不是会比废奴前更坏？如果抱着这个心态，奴隶制恐怕至今还在美国存在。

@Henry Yang 完全同意。那位老兄完全是一种老中的思维。在中国日常生活当我们批评什么政策时，常有人要我们换位思考，假如你来做，你会怎么样？或许更糟。其实在这问题上，不必换位思考。解决方案是各州或各大学的能人解决的。不能说你没有更好的方案，就不能批评。我相信，只要废除那些明的暗的歧视，对亚裔对华裔都是非常有利的

@王耀明 去年反SCA5时，就有人象那位谈云先生一样，战战兢兢地问：如果我们的抗议得罪了西裔，他们会不会打击报复？后果会不会更坏？

转发：The Secret to Ultimate Financial Success in USA: You & your girlfriend can live like a king! Just follow these proven 13 steps:
:
1. Don't marry her
2. Use your mom's address for your mail
3. The guy buys a house
4. Guy rents out house to his girlfriend who has 2 of his kids
5. Section 8 will pay $900 a month for a 3-bedroom home
6. Girlfriend signs up for ObamaCare; guy doesn't have to pay out-the-butt for family insurance
7. Girlfriend goes to college for free being a single mother
8. Girlfriend gets $600 a month for food stamps
9. Girlfriend gets free cell phone
10. Girlfriend gets free utilities
11. Guy moves into home but uses mom's house for his mail
12. Girlfriend claims one (1) kid & guy claims one (1) kid on taxes. Now you both get to claim Head of Household @ $1,800 credit
13. Girlfriend gets disability for being "crazy" or having a "bad back" @$1,800 a month & never has to work again

This plan is perfectly legal & is being executed now by millions of people. A married couple w/ a stay-at-home-mom yields $0 dollars. An unmarried couple w/stay-at-home-mom nets:
$21,600 disability +
$10,800 free housing +
$6,000 free ObamaCare +
$6,000 free food +
$4,800 free utilities +
$6,000 Pell Grant money to spend +
$12,000 a year in college tuition free from Pell Grant +
$8,800 tax benefit for being a single mother = $75,000 a year in benefits.

Any idea why the country is $18+ trillion in debt? Any idea why so many children are born with no father? Hawaii Senator Wakai advises that welfare is the largest line-item in the state budget （注：少打仗，少无偿地保护其他国家也能降低国债）

@Henry Yang 你去一边玩去

For people who are actually interested in the impact of Supreme Court on higher education admission policy, here is a good link on its history: https://www.insidehighered.com/news/2015/06/30/supreme-court-will-once-again-consider-affirmative-action-college-admissions, particularly its sidebar which lists the precedent setting cases. The U.S. legal system belongs to Anglo-Saxon Common Law system whose many details are actually driven by case law.

An interesting note: the current Harvard admission policy is explicitly modeled after the Supreme Court's decision on Grutter v. Bollinger. Edward Blum recruited the Fisher case in the hope that the new case will allow the more conservative Supreme Court to move the line further to the right, basically overturn the precedent set by Grutter v. Bollinger.

@谈云识天气 你完全搞反了：不是哈佛的招生政策按照Grutter v. Bollinger, 而是Bakke v. UC regents 的判决modeled after哈佛政策，Grutter v. Bollinger reaffirmed Bakke

@赵宇空 some big companies do the similar things. GE pays zero tax (if I remember correctly) and stores money outside the U.S.. 一颗大树不健康时，大小蛀虫都来啃一口。

哈佛以培养大蛀虫为主。70%进华尔街和相关行业。

@谈云识天气 hope you do not have a mission deliver Harvard's propaganda. When NPR reporter said same thing on behalf of Harvard during our news conference, I challenged Harvard to open its admissions books if they claim their admissions practices are legal and not discriminatory against Asian Americans. So far, Harvard is not brave enough to respond to my challenge.

@赵宇空 但是谈云识天气is brave enough来讲各种自己都没搞清的东西，比如Blum提出了top 10%方案，比如哈佛招生is modeled after Grutter v. Bollinger

亚裔在这里争取平等，为的是我们栖息的这颗大树能一直健康下去。

The amazingly same fixed admission rates for Asian Americans in Harvard and other Ivy Leagues over the last twenty years is not "holistic review of each individual," as Harvard claimed, but a de facto ratio quota, in violation of Supreme Court ruling of 1978. I do not have to mention other discriminations.

@赵宇空 你怎么也在转发这种不靠普的文章? 我对你很尊重, 不想说重话。你们有verify 过你可以拿到那么多的钱吗?

@steven chen 哪句不靠谱？而且不是拿这么多钱，只是相当于这些钱的benefit, 比如obamacare和tuition

转发：The Secret to Ultimate Financial Success in USA: You & your girlfriend can live like a king! Just follow these proven 13 steps:
:
1. Don't marry her
2. Use your mom's address for your mail
3. The guy buys a house
4. Guy rents out house to his girlfriend who has 2 of his kids
5. Section 8 will pay $900 a month for a 3-bedroom home
6. Girlfriend signs up for ObamaCare; guy doesn't have to pay out-the-butt for family insurance
7. Girlfriend goes to college for free being a single mother
8. Girlfriend gets $600 a month for food stamps
9. Girlfriend gets free cell phone
10. Girlfriend gets free utilities
11. Guy moves into home but uses mom's house for his mail
12. Girlfriend claims one (1) kid & guy claims one (1) kid on taxes. Now you both get to claim Head of Household @ $1,800 credit
13. Girlfriend gets disability for being "crazy" or having a "bad back" @$1,800 a month & never has to work again

This plan is perfectly legal & is being executed now by millions of people. A married couple w/ a stay-at-home-mom yields $0 dollars. An unmarried couple w/stay-at-home-mom nets:
$21,600 disability +
$10,800 free housing +
$6,000 free ObamaCare +
$6,000 free food +
$4,800 free utilities +
$6,000 Pell Grant money to spend +
$12,000 a year in college tuition free from Pell Grant +
$8,800 tax benefit for being a single mother = $75,000 a year in benefits.

Any idea why the country is $18+ trillion in debt? Any idea why so many children are born with no father? Hawaii Senator Wakai advises that welfare is the largest line-item in the state budget （注：少打仗，少无偿地保护其他国家也能降低国债）

@steven chen 哪句不靠谱？

谁有本事得到$75,000 benefits a year? 你们试验过了吗? 还是你们有一个真实的case?

你得指出哪句不靠谱

我们不少华人也在拿其中的一些benefits. 你们难道一点也没有拿吗? 但是很少有人可以同时拿到所有的benefits.

你们的文章想要暗示说别的人拿那么多钱, 如果一个人没有拿到那么多, 他就很吃亏。是不是?

@steven chen 到底哪句不靠谱啊？

你的口气好像已经转成这篇文章基本靠谱了

@Henry Yang 如果你能找到这么一个老婆的话那这篇文章就靠谱了。否则就是胡说八道。知道吗, 如果有人被汽车碰了, 他可能拿到更多的钱。

@赵宇空 : "I challenged Harvard to open its admissions books if they claim their admissions practices are legal and not discriminatory against Asian Americans. So far, Harvard is not brave enough to respond to my challenge."

You think this is street fight in China? Do you even know how the U.S. legal system works? No wonder you're played by Edward Blum.

What happened to your case?! It got bounced right back because you didn't do your own homework and copied much material from Blum's case. You didn't get ANY answers you want. Meanwhile Blum got publicity and political cover from you, and his case is going forward. You have no operational control over Blum's case. You cannot stop him from proposing top x percent as solution. You leave our fate in others' hands. Some great job.

@谈云识天气 it's great Blum's case moving forward, and has the potential to terminate systematic racial discrimination in college admissions once and for all!

@steven chen 這是所有條件都到位才能拿到的maximum benefits. 如果能計劃到所有條件到位，此公不是領這種benefits 的料孑。常有這種故意誤導的數字/例子

@谈云识天气 能否多说些正能量的东西？抱怨他人的努力，也不利己

@谈云识天气 另一方面，一个对Blum诉讼基本事实都没搞清的人，居然来教育大家美国的legal system, 真的是需要巨大的勇气

@谈云识天气 why do you feel so depressed when we have a chance to change the status quo (which is the worst discrimination against our children)? I am very optimistic now

@Charles @steven chen 大家先别讨论免费福利的事，都集中精力来听一听@谈云识天气 的免费笑话段子好不好？

@赵宇空 It is telling you have no defense against accusation of incompetence. You choose to degenerate to @Henry Yang 's level.

@谈云识天气 top 10%到底是德州议会通过的还是Blum发明的？到底是哈佛摸式is modeled after Grutter, 还是Grutter is modeled after 哈佛模式？

谁有心思答理一个连基本事实都没搞清的人的accusation

@谈云识天气 ? Disclose your real name, do not act as A Coward who hides his true identity and devoted to spreading misinformation and personal attack.

@谈云识天气 呵呵！耍赖就没意思了。亨利的问题，您老正面回答一下吧

老用人身攻击这最后一招，不太管用的

俺重复一遍：