“With all due respect, I don't agree with your point however. Chomsky is a critic of the US foreign policy, and he is strongly against censorship, and FOR freedom of speech. He also critiqued the Soviet approach. Criticizing narrow reporting should have nothing to do with whether he would choose to live in a totalitarian regime. He is an anarchist. ”
Media as soft dictatorship, Habermas 的说法。
当然有高明和不高明的区别。人民日报海外版和纽约时报都有自己的倾向性,但水准有天地之别。
听听意见
@Karl 同意。所以我觉得她应该讲西方媒体洗脑的高明之处,让大家学习并且学会分辨才有意义。
燕子
Btw,我建议大家听完他的演讲,而不是以自己先入为主的观念去judge Chomsky. 听听他提供的原文quotes。包括在一小时那里讲到 “do not want to publicize US genocidal activities. Little reviewed. Suppressed.” 即使我们未必同意他的观点,"It is a good idea to watch the performance of the free press with a cautious and skeptical eye."
http://www.amazon.com/Different-Kind-War-Sanctions-Regime/dp/1845452224