@解滨 我认为华人偏民主党是因为共和党的方式让华人（“外”人之一）感觉不舒服，which is changing. 这在蓝州和较开明的州里好一些。华人一般也不太喜欢呆在红州。民主党没有那种居高临下的感觉，但他们的理念和华人的传统，hard working, family, play by rules，Education等不在一个方向上。我认为，如果共和党改变方式，华人会右转。
(在Schuette v. BAMN一案中，)“we confront a frighteningly bizarre question: Does the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment forbid what its text plainly requires? Needless to say(except that this case obliges us to say it), the question answers itself. “The Constitution proscribes government discrimination on the basis of race, and state-provided education is no exception.”... It is precisely this understanding—the correct understanding—of the federal Equal Protection Clause that the people of the State of Michigan have adopted for their own fundamental law. By adopting it, they did not simultaneously offend it.”
“As Justice Harlan observed over a century ago, “ur Constitution is color-blind, and neither knows nor tolerates classes among citizens.” ...The people of Michigan wish the same for their governing charter. It would be shameful for us to stand in their way."
认定法学院种族歧视政策合法的五位大法官是：O'Connor, Stevens, Souter, Ginsburg, and Breyer；反对这一判决的四位大法官是：Rehnquist, Kennedy, Scalia, and Thomas. 黑人大法官 Thomas在反对意见中更是一针见血地指出：
“The Constitution abhors classifications based on race … every time the government places citizens on racial registers and makes race relevant to the provision of burdens or benefits, it demeans us all. ‘Purchased at the price of immeasurable human suffering, the equal protection principle reflects our Nation’s understanding that such classifications ultimately have a destructive impact on the individual and our society.’”
@Yan Y “ 你细读读每个共和党执政目标吧。这次有人贴出我这里共和党竞选board member那些人的网址，我一看就笑了。真不知到你们和他们在教育上有什么共同点”建议你先说内容，再说你为什么会笑。。希望这里的所有的群友，多表达观点，少表达态度。人多未必有理，大家care about 你的观点，不care你的态度。
